arXiv / 2019

The Challenge of Imputation in Explainable Artificial Intelligence Models

Muhammad Aurangzeb Ahmad, Carly Eckert, Ankur Teredesai

Foundation ModelsLarge Language ModelsPopular and Landmark PapersRobotics

Explainable models in Artificial Intelligence are often employed to ensure transparency and accountability of AI systems. The fidelity of the explanations are dependent upon the algorithms used as well as on the fidelity of the data. Many real world datasets have missing values that can greatly influence explanation fidelity. The standard way to deal with such scenarios is imputation. This can, however, lead to situations where the imputed values may correspond to a setting which refer to counterfactuals. Acting on explanations from AI models with imputed values may lead to unsafe outcomes. In this paper, we explore different settings where AI models with imputation can be problematic and describe ways to address such scenarios.

0 citations0 influential

Full paper

Read the original paper

Open PDF Source page

Learning resources

arXiv PDFPDF arXiv abstract pagearXiv Google Scholar referencesGoogle Scholar Papers with Code searchPapers with Code YouTube explanationsYouTube

Reading state

Discuss in ChatGPT

Uses your own ChatGPT account. The paper context is copied into a tutor prompt before ChatGPT opens.

Preview prompt

You are my AI/ML research paper instructor. I want to deeply understand the paper below.

First, teach it in layers:
1. One-paragraph intuition.
2. Problem statement and why it mattered.
3. Key method, architecture, or algorithm.
4. Important equations or mechanisms, explained intuitively.
5. Experiments and evidence.
6. Limitations, assumptions, and failure modes.
7. How this paper influenced later AI/ML/Deep Learning/GenAI work.
8. A 30-minute study plan with checkpoints.
9. Quiz me with 5 questions and wait for my answers.

When something is not available in the attached context, say what is missing and infer carefully.

### Paper attached as context
Title: The Challenge of Imputation in Explainable Artificial Intelligence Models
Authors: Muhammad Aurangzeb Ahmad, Carly Eckert, Ankur Teredesai
Year: 2019
Venue: arXiv
Categories: Foundation Models, Large Language Models, Popular and Landmark Papers, Robotics
Citations: 0
Paper URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.12669v1
Open PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1907.12669v1

Abstract:
Explainable models in Artificial Intelligence are often employed to ensure transparency and accountability of AI systems. The fidelity of the explanations are dependent upon the algorithms used as well as on the fidelity of the data. Many real world datasets have missing values that can greatly influence explanation fidelity. The standard way to deal with such scenarios is imputation. This can, however, lead to situations where the imputed values may correspond to a setting which refer to counterfactuals. Acting on explanations from AI models with imputed values may lead to unsafe outcomes. In this paper, we explore different settings where AI models with imputation can be problematic and describe ways to address such scenarios.

Learning resources:
- PDF: arXiv PDF (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1907.12669v1)
- arXiv: arXiv abstract page (https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.12669v1)
- Google Scholar: Google Scholar references (https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=The%20Challenge%20of%20Imputation%20in%20Explainable%20Artificial%20Intelligence%20Models)
- Papers with Code: Papers with Code search (https://paperswithcode.com/search?q=The%20Challenge%20of%20Imputation%20in%20Explainable%20Artificial%20Intelligence%20Models)
- YouTube: YouTube explanations (https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=The%20Challenge%20of%20Imputation%20in%20Explainable%20Artificial%20Intelligence%20Models+paper+explained)